|
How does Guam compare?
Chart
Firstly, the HIV infection rates per 100,000 in population in the chart
to the left must be viewed with caution. Different countnes have limited
HIV testing resourses. Others have little uniformity in HIV/AIDS reporting
requirements or expertise to make reports. Generally, reports of HIV per
cqpita infection may be widely underreported.
Countries
and areas like Guam, CNMI, and Australia have well developed reporting systems.
This not the case in some other Pacific/Asian countries. Therefore, when
comparing the per capita HIV rates, remember that the rates are based only
on reported data and we know that reporting require ments are not uniform.
Since the data may not be reliably repolted, the HIV infection rates may
also be unreliable.
Nevertheless,
since both the Western Regional Office of UNAIDS and South Pacific Commission
provide quite comparable data and there is no practical way to obtam more
reliable data, we will discuss this data with the reliability caveat in
mind.
The
population used in determining our chart WCIS derived from population data
and is based on HIV infection reports received as of 8/31/96. The South
Pacific Commission population data for Guam (153,700) is mid-1996. Population
differences or one or two more HIV-infected people may account for the slight
difference in values for Guam and a few other locations.
Data
from the South Pacific Commission and the Regional Office of UNAIDS suggest
that Guam ranks sixth in HIV infection among the seven countries in the
region highest in HIV infection.
Since
UNAIDS pointed out that HIV testing and reporting may be artificially low
in many countries for which data was provided, the reality of where we are
in comparison to others may vary widely.
Nevertheless,
the figures do strongly suggest that on a per capita basis, HIV infection
in Guam is far from low and perhaps among the highest in the region. Please
help stop HIV from being spread even more on Guam.
|