|
|
Oral sex: Is it dangerous?
In January a community forum was held in San Francisco to discuss oral
sex and HIV transmission.
According
to Paul O'Malley of the San Francisco Health Department, a study was conducted
of 675 gay and bisexual men between 184 - 1992. In the study 49 of the participants
became HIV positive.
This
study can be interpreted to suggest that less than one percent of the participants
attributed their HIV conversion to oral sex.
O'Malley
says that HIV transmission does occur but that it does not appear to fuel
the epidemic.
Oral
sex is considered low risk compared to anal sex because the mucus membrane
in the mouth is thicker than the membrane in the anus. Also , saliva may
be an inhibiting factor to virus transmission.
O'Malley
warned that people should not brush their teeth just before giving oral
sex. There is some potential risk from pre - cum; however, this risk is
probably lower due to the amount of fluid.
Participants
were also reminded that HIV is present in all body fluids including vaginal
fluids, so that oral sex with a woman also has risk attached. One should
avoid ingesting menstrual fluids.
In
addition to HIV, there are other sexually transmitted diseases which are
definitely more infections than HIV and may be life - threatening to people
who are HIV positive. As their names implies, sexually transmitted diseases,
STDs for short, are transmitted by unprotected sexual activity. Protection
for HIV and STDs consist of using a latex barrier such as a male or female
condom.
As
always, the study should be interpreted with caution. It can interpreted
to mean what you want it to mean.
Oral
sex may be safer than anal sex, except if you were one of the 49 people
who became HIV infected.
The
Arrow Archer recommends that you talk about the risks of HIV transmission
with your partner, practice safer sex and get tested for HIV.
(Bay Area Reporter 1/25/96) |